Well now, with the Twishite saga finally having reached its vastly overdue finale (Seriously, even splitting the final book in two? How gullible can an audience be?), with which people are obviously obsessed since swallowing the lie it is good cinema featuring a GOOD ROLE MODEL FOR WOMEN (really?), I am hugely excited about the cinema we have coming up this season; it's almost like they have been holding the quality stuff back so as not be overshadowed by the twinkly vampire monstrosity. A quick look through forthcoming releases, I find my unashamed film-geek side almost salivating. But that is for later, right now I'd like to talk about three films I have already seen, and I've cheated a little. Usually I review films I've seen in the week only, but I've only seen one this week, and I realise there are a couple I saw some time back which I never talked about enough, so now that those movies are available to rent or buy, I'm going to take the opportunity to talk about them ...because this is my blog...and I can :)
THE MASTER
So this was a recent cinema release, directed by PT Anderson, who is not the most easy film maker, which, due its controversial topic, style, and I think partly due to the aforemention Breaking Dawn, is not being shown for long in many places. A WW2 veteran returns to America
traumatized and with little direction; he finds himself, like many others,
sucked into a world that is overseen and seemingly controlled by The
Master.
P. T. Anderson's last film
'There Will Be Blood' was a masterpiece; this isn't quite that, but it is
almost as impossible to talk about. David Lynch once explained how the
beautiful language of cinema should not be translated back into words
once a film is complete, and Anderson's movies seem to illustrate his point. Since Magnolia he
has sat somewhere between Kubrick and Lynch, making films utterly without
compromise and completely enthralling; I for one hope he continues to do so. He always seems intent, like
Kubrick, on finding a new language of film; his voice is very unique, and consequently not to everyone's taste. It is funny how he and Tarantino are very good friends and mutual admirers, since as film makers, you could hardly imagine two directors with approaches more different!
The Master is far more a character study than it is a narrative, and many may find this frustrating. A look at opportunistic power, religion, the role of belief systems, their pros and cons, and America at this
point in history, it is long and heavygoing. Nevertheless, with another strange and superb Johnny Greenwood (Radiohead) soundtrack, stunning cinematograhy, outstanding
performances all round, particularly from the ever infallible P S
Hoffman, Joaquin Phoenix (who looks strangely terrifying as the vulnerable veteran, whose trauma is literally made manifest in his twisted physicality) and Amy Adams (a million miles from The Muppets here), this is a must for cinema fans. Despite its form, I would say this is certainly an Oscar contender in at least a couple
of categories. I do understand it is a difficult movie, and it may be worth familiarising yourself with Anderson first, but if you want near masterful cinema, when you do get a chance, check this out.
4/5
Catch if it you like: David Lynch, Stanley Kubrick, Magnolia, There Will Be Blood
KILLER JOE
William Friedkin is rarely one to tread on eggshells; from the visceral
power of 'The Exorcist' to the radical characterisation in 'The French
Connection' to the uncompromising adaption of Tracy Letts' play 'Bug',
he opposes the notion of watering anything down for an audience. In
fact, by his own words, he comes from a school where confrontation and
challenge were desired, adult storytelilng for people who understand art
can engage, enlighten and infuriate as much as it can lightly
entertain. Whether times and audiences have changed is debatable, but
what certainly isn't is that Friedkin has not, for here he is
with a second adaption of a Tracy Letts play, and it may be the most
nasty, twisted, scuzzy release this year, one which has the power to
drop jaws (literally) and draw genuine gasps and howls from the
audience. A rarity. Where 'Bug' clearly dealt with post-9/11 themes of
paranoia and fear, and wouldn't have been out of place in David
Cronenberg's catalogue, 'Killer Joe' is a more sloppy affair, whose
comment on "trailer trash American culture, morality and familial
breakdown", if indeed that is at all what it is, is tougher to discern.
What remains clear, however, is both Letts' desire, and Friendkin's
ability, to shock and appaul an audience.
Emile Hirsch is
possibly the weakest link of the cast, as the young drug dealer who
ropes his dad and stepmother into a noir plot to off his estranged
mother in order to collect her life insurance. Thankfully, the rest of the cast hold their scenes up and carry Hirsch nicely, with Thomas Haden Church
in particular bringing a great deal of humour with him. The fact the
last thing I saw him in was 'We Bought A Zoo' only makes this cast seem
more surreal. The UK's own Juno Temple is perfect as the innocent,
simple sister in all this, drawn against her will and in the most
underhanded way, into the arrangement.
The movie is utterly owned
by Matthew McConaughey, though. Fans only familiar with his rom-com
King/sex symbol status are in for a nasty/exhilirating shock. His
performance as Joe is incredibly powerful; it reminds us that he is
actually a great actor (we all recall 'A Time To Kill'?), and that he
has a level to which, even in his most heavy roles, we have not seen him
go before...and here it is! The less said about where he goes with the
character the better, but let's say he has created a screen presence as
intense and intimidating as Dennis Hopper's Frank Booth in Lynch's
'Blue Velvet'. It reached a point fairly quickly where he didn't
actually have to be doing anything, and I found myself on edge just
because of his presence. If he does not receive a 'Best Actor'
nomination, there will be something very wrong.
The movie has its
problems, but they are not really worth mentioning. It isn't quite the
maserpiece I secretly wanted him to have created, but it is a
stunning-looking, extreme, startling vision, which has more moments of
important, well-observed subtext than I think can be picked up on in one
sitting. Due to its sexual politics and surprising moments of
extremity, it caused walkouts, prompted conversations
over just how nasty and depraved a film should be allowed to be, and
caused young ladies to get all up in a huff over their dreamboat's
decision to be part of something so vile. Don't say you weren't warned.
Certificate 18 for a
reason, this is 'Blue Velvet' meets 'Blood Simple' via 'American Psycho'
with a dash of Quentin Tarantino. Slightly surreal, very tough to
watch, but even harder to look away from. It will make you laugh, gasp,
cringe, and leave having to talk about it. You will experience
something intense, whether you like it or not, and sometimes, as William
"The Exorcist" Friedkin would undoubtedly say, that is what it's all
about.
I saw this a few months back; you can rent or buy this now!
4/5
Catch it if you like: Blue Velvet, Bug
COSMOPOLIS
David Cronenberg is a film maker who, for
over 30 years, has refused to work anywhere other than at the edge. He
is the director known for pioneering body horror, dealing with concepts
that push any audience willing to take the ride to consider that which
they wouldn't otherwise. Known for his ability to use visual metaphor
in the way a novelist or poet might use a literary one, the closest to
blockbusting success he has come would be 'The Fly'. At some point he
made a transition, not necessarily a conscious effort on his part, but a
clear change nevertheless. The common themes of his work remain, the
ideas of psychology, identity, transformation, the horror within, etc.
but recently we have seen a more subtle approach, with finesse of
performance and what is being said taking precedence over purely
visceral assault and visual effects. From this "new" Cronenberg we have
seen unsung masterpieces ('A History Of Violence'), modest successes
('Eastern Promises'), and he has proven himself to be somebody not
afraid of adapting for the screen dangerous material that most wouldn't
dare touch ('Crash' and 'A Dangerous Method'). 'Cosmopolis' sees him
doing the latter again, and definitely with the greatest sense of
experimentation so far. The film falls in the category into which we
would put David Lynch's most surreal work, one for cinema that defies
description as simply good or bad, and instead invites you to an
experience, one whose quality only YOU can decide.
Adapted from
the Don Delillo book, which was already pointedly distant, David
Cronenberg's latest offering has drawn a fair deal of negative criticism
for retaining the detached approach of the novel, and for being, it
would seem, deliberately cold and apparently uninterested in its
audience. Cold it is, most certainly; indeed if it were any colder it
could sink Titanic all over again, but quite honestly this is the only
truly valid criticism of the film, and I don't even consider it a
criticism so much as an observation. Its coldness is clearly
intentional due to the subject matter, and much like an iceberg, what
you think you've seen on first inspection turns out to be just a bit of
what's actually going on. Indeed for a film set for the most part in a
silent (really, completely silent!) limousine, it is one you can delve
into surprisingly deeply, and find level after level of meaty ideas to
chew on.
Truth of the matter is this movie was never going to
receive huge commercial success, it is simply too divisive for obvious
reasons:
- A tough, obtuse novel that reads like a discombobulating dream
-
A director who adapts it almost directly, creating arguably his most
experimental film, and if anything emphasizing all the more the
metaphoric devices of the story.
- Casting a teen heartthrob from
one of the biggest cinema series of all time in the lead, making it
immediately eligible for the mainstream audience, a brave choice on both
parts. A fair amount of people walking into this film are "seeing the
new R Pattinson film" and have no idea what they are in for. I am just thankful to see clear signs that the man himself is not impressed with his starting point; I look forward to a lot more grown up, serious work from this guy, as it is clear there is some talent there. He has already signed up on the next Cronenberg picture alongside Viggo Mortensen, so we shall see what happens. Let's hope he is serious about wanting to distance himself from it all.
Put
this all together and you have a small, experimental film that you have
to be completely prepared for, one that is purposefully aloof and
probably disappointing to at least half the audience who weren't to know
any better. On the other hand, you have a master of his craft making
cinema from an un-cinematic source that is essentially metaphor piled
upon metaphor, drawing a compelling performance from a lead who I never
thought I'd like, and creating something which, despite all that has
been said about its impenetrability, actually managed to pull me in to a
point where I wanted to know where it was all leading.
So where
does it all lead? An inevitable showdown with an acting veteran, a 20
minute scene, driven by some stunning dialogue. It is a scene I think
Stanley Kubrick would have been proud to put his name to; as he once
said, "It might be real, but it's not interesting." Well I think
'Cosmopolis' proves his point nicely; it may not be "real" but there is
definitely something exciting happening that I didn't want to walk away
from. If you are still on board by the end, it will knock your socks
off and bring the film to a close in a way that makes some strange,
demented sense, and even carve out some empathy, though who you feel it
for may be unclear.
I completely appreciate this is a niche
film, and many either won't understand it, or won't work to engage with
it at all. Certainly most people going for the star are going to leave
confused. If, however, you are a Cronenberg fan and you want to see him
treading some genuinely new cinematic ground, or you simply have
patience and an understanding that cinema does not necessarily have to
make full sense to be exciting, try this out. Certainly due to be the
strangest film this year, but one I can't stop replaying in my head and
wanting to watch again for reasons I can't even explain. Pattinson's
character Eric says, "Show me something I don't know." This echoes
nicely the attitude with which you need to approach this film to even
stand a chance of getting into it, but if you can you might just be
surprised. My rating reflects a general audience potential view of the film balanced with my own feelings on it...I kiss Cronenberg's ass more than most reading might, so I'm trying to be fair :)
You can rent or buy this now.
3.5 / 5
Catch it if you like: David Cronenberg, or the idea of Robert Pattinson actually performing
A cinephile, film fanatic, movie buff; whatever you want to call me, I am hugely passionate about film, and these are my thoughts on things I've seen that I fancy talking about. Nowadays a lot of people vlog or use YouTube, but with writing being another passion, a blog seems perfect!
Search This Blog
Sunday, 25 November 2012
Sunday, 18 November 2012
DEFTONES - KOI NO YOKAN
Remember when Korn were gracing the covers of Metal Hammer all the time, when Blind was the biggest song on rock radio
and they were heralded as pioneers? The
truth is they were merely holding the door open for bands like Limp Bizkit, Papa
Roach, Disturbed, Staind, Taproot and Linkin Park to wander through (and
promptly shit all over the floor); Deftones were the band who, with debut
record Adrenaline, kicked that door
open in the first place! They were the
true Kings of Nu Metal, and as if to reaffirm that status, they followed it up
with an album many rock fans may recall as being quite good, Around The Fur, featuring a little ditty
called My Own Summer (Shove It). Then, in 2000, something happened nobody
foresaw; while many of those other bands were sinking with the nu metal ship,
recycling the same old boring ideas and sounds, moaning relentlessly about how awful
it is to be buggered by your father and beaten by your mother (even when they
hadn’t experienced such horrors), Deftones were swimming away from the wreckage...fast! White
Pony was their difficult third album, the one by which most artists can
tend to be judged more harshly; you’re not allowed to recycle the same thing a
second time, but you mustn’t disappoint your fan-base either; it is easy to see
why it is a tough record to make, and why a lot of bands tend to drop off the
map with it. White Pony did indeed disappoint those who wanted more of the same,
but for the rest of us it was a breath of fresh air, with a new approach, a
maturity and a confidence, it was a near perfect record that quickly had them
being referred to as the Radiohead of
metal due to its daring freshness and new sound (as opposed to nu sound). Still very much Deftones, but to some degree
a shift in gear for a band who had matured and allowed more non-metal
influences on their music to shine more obviously.
As a big fan of Deftones it was not easy for me to acknowledge
my disappointment with what followed.
The lack of title for their fourth outing was indicative of its laziness,
and the rather average and somewhat disjointed Saturday Night Wrist was a bit of a non-event. Then they became one of those bands that were
“hit and miss when playing live”, and I came to terms with the idea that they
had dropped the ball permanently. This
feeling of loss of such a musical force was only cemented by the tragic
accident that put bassist Chi Cheng into a coma. Imagine my pleasant surprise, then, when they
came back a couple of years ago with friend Sergio Vega on the low end and an
impressive record in Diamond Eyes! A little burdened by some ‘filler’, it is
nevertheless a far weightier and satisfying affair than its couple of predecessors,
and importantly, it was an indication that there was life in the beast yet.
Well now we have Koi
No Yokan, an 11 track mammoth record, which confirms the re-birth of the
most important band in the nu metal movement as now one of the most innovative
alt rock bands working today! Twenty
years on, to still expect any Adrenaline
Pt 2 is ridiculous (just go and listen to that record, dude), but that
said, the album is not without its nods to previous work. Kicking off with the strident Swerve City, we are immediately smiling
at the promise this might be as good as anything offered up on White Pony; the energy and groove are
top-notch, and the hook is a dangerously addictive one. It is not the last time
that album seems to be referenced either; Gauze is jagged, deceptively heavy and
nicely textured in a way that brings Korea
to mind, a sort of controlled chaos at points that houses some great bass
work from Sergio, while Romantic Dreams
is evidence that Frank Delgado is now officially a necessary member of this
team, who pulls in the same direction as the rest and broadens their canvas, as
first truly seen on White Pony,
rather than a gimmicky fifth member just added after the fact. All over this record his keys and samples can
be heard to be doing so much more than anything DJ Lethal offers Limp Bizkit. On Entombed,
for example, a song that might not sound out of place on a new A Perfect Circle
record, he adds a hypnotic layer, and on Tempest,
one of the tracks they previewed prior to the album’s release and one which
took a little time to grow on me, his work pulls you in and makes the track all
the more compelling, complementing the song’s dark grooves and beautiful dynamics. Another grower is Graphic Nature, which has a certain Adrenaline vibe going on, and sounds like it should have been the
best song on Saturday Night Wrist, its
guitar work at times bringing the likes of punk legends Fugazi to mind, and Abe
really shining with some nifty, very precise hi-hat grooving.
It may take time, but this could end up being a fan favourite.
Another song they previewed, Leathers, nods its head to Around
The Fur, with grooves full of swagger and huge guitars. It is another example of the band’s desire to
step away from the standard format of their peers, playing in 11/8 time. It is not the only time they let this
progressive tendency show either; Poltergeist,
featuring sexy guitar effects and continuing the progression they made with Diamond Eyes, shows Chino’s penchant for
a ‘hip-hop’ type of delivery in the verses, with a 7/4 time signature,
completely atypical of the genre these guys are supposed to be part of. If further evidence were needed that they do
not see themselves in the same bracket as a lot of their peers anymore, look no
further than Rosemary, a slow build
to a slow BPM, putting on show an affection for the ‘post rock’ influence
without going overboard, it is heavy and
seductive. A huge Djent riff leads into
a gentle outro that cleanses the palette ready for Goon Squad, which grows out of it expertly.
Chino sounds like he cares more than ever about his
performance on this; he is writing what seem to be his most positive and
evocative lyrics, delivering gorgeous hooks with his unmistakable approach. He is singing in that seductive way only he
really can, and screaming very little, but it is exactly what is required for
where they are as a band. Any doubt
that Sergio or Delgado may not fit is eradicated, Steph again shows off his
ability to keep what he does simple yet hugely effective, with often molten
heavy, groove-laden riffs. Abe
Cunningham is as solid and unpredictable a drummer as ever, straddling the line
between punk and progressive perfectly.
Their reinvigoration may be down to working with Rush and
Foo Fighters producer Nick Raskulinecz, who has helped them inject a boldness
to their sound that has been lacking for some time. Maybe it is certain members of the band
cleaning up their act on a personal level and getting back to doing what they
do best. Perhaps it is the love for Chi Cheng
and the hope he will return to play the music they enjoy making once again. The latter is most apparent on uplifting album
closer What Happened To You? which I
am sure was written in Chi’s honour. It may be all of the above, but one thing is
for sure, Koi No Yokan is all the
good things we know Deftones for rolled into one record with equal measure and
perfect balance. Dark and beautiful, textured
and varied, heavy and emotional, it is their most creative work since White Pony, and unlike the last few
records, it is in perfect playing order and has not one moment that you feel
the urge to skip; in fact you feel almost rude for even considering skipping a song, and I struggle to pick highlights, it is that good! This is an album you
enjoy most when listening from front to back, in its entirety. If there is any complaint, it is only that there isn't enough of it. This record is a tremendous gift if you're already a Deftones fan, and for anyone who is not, it's a perfect introduction. There
may be some who say it is their best album
to date; it is a statement I would not try to argue with.
5/5
Labels:
album,
chino moreno,
deftones,
heavy,
heavy metal,
koi no yokan,
metal,
music,
release,
review,
rock
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)